Nanotech Musings

I’ve been thinking a lot about the future lately. A couple days ago I
started fantisizing about what
nanotechnology
>
could mean to the medical field, and ultimately to the lives of humans. I’m
sure the majority of this stuff is assembled from dozens of tidbits I’ve
read over the years on the topic, but I’ll indulge anyway.

Basics

The main idea for nanotechnology and medicine is a microscopic “robot” that
can carry instructions given to it by its controller. In this case it would
be the doctor/technician doing the treatment. The concept is that rather
than being primitive and pumping a body full of general drugs that
also target something undesirable in the body (while simultaneously
tearing up countless other bits), a nanobot would see things at the celular
level.

This perspective, combined with superior instructions and the ability to
manipulate its environment, would allow such an entity to simply remove,
deconstruct, and essentially assassinate known pathogens.

Imagine for a second that there is a bomb in a 50 story office building, and
the bomb is capable of blowing up like half of the city. Well, current
medicine, for the most part, releases a “death ooze” into the entire city
that connects to everything. The upside is that when this ooze binds to
bombs it’s able to disable them to a large degree, after which time if the
bomb goes off it only takes out a room or two rather than the whole
building.

The bad news is that the death ooze released to defuse the bomb also binds
to other things. Cars, children, and everything else. Unfortunately, most of
these things don’t react to well to the ooze. Some get violently ill; some
die. Even when it’s not this extreme, it kills all the plants in the city,
and it makes the whole place stink for 6 months.

The biggest problem with this technique is that little is actually known
about the ooze. Essentially, somone figured out one day that the ooze works
against bombs. And since it doesn’t seem to kill people immediately, it can
probably be sold for large sums of money to those with a bomb problem.

The ooze I speak of is the pharmaceutical industry’s response to everything
— drugs. It’s the crap that get pushed into one’s body in hope of the result
being slightly better than the side effects.

A Better Way

Nanotechnology offers an alternative. Instead of releasing a myriad of
mostly unknown toxins into the body in hopes of killing something worse than
the toxins, why not just go and find the problem?

This is what nanotechnolgy promises — the ability to identify and counter
any known pathogen.

Seek and Destroy

So imagine something like HIV. What if we could inject someone with an army
of nanobots designed to do nothing but destroy HIV? They would course
through the like a driver moving through traffic. So, using the car analogy,
let us say that the nanobot knows that any car with 4 antennas on its roof
is an HIV virus, and that it’s ability to harm other cells is due to its
having a wench on the front bumper.

Well, at that point it simply finds all cars/virii with 4 antennae on them,
and then it violently strips them of their wenches. Voila! Now the virus can
do no damage. This happens on a mass scale through the whole body, until a
certain predefined point is reached. Then the master-bot reports back to the
doctor that x number of virii have been killed, and that the infection is
under control.

Repair

So that’s how the basics work — you can go in and manipulate things on the
sub-cellular level. This presents some very interesting possibilities in
terms of fixing existing problems. Let’s say that in 10 years we know what
causes aging, or what causes cancer. And using the car analogy, it turns out
it’s cars that have a certain kind of tint on the windows in addition to
having too little air in the front right tire.

Well at that point we could send in a special team of bots to start fixing
cars. Take the tint off the windows. Put some air in those tires. Or, if
there’s a problem, just destroy any car that you see with those issues.

I can see someone going into the doctors office in the future and watching
with the physician as the number of cancer cells in their body is reduced
from 2 million to 2,000 in a matter of hours. They watch this happen on a
screen — a screen showing vitals and receiving reports from the
controller-bot within the patients body.

Active Defense

That’s all cool and everything, but the most exciting thing for me (maybe
because I’m in information security) is the notion of maintaining an active
defense using these nanobots.

Get a weekly breakdown of what’s happening in security and tech—and why it matters.

We’ve all heard of antivirus, right? Like on a computer? Well, imagine this.
When you are born you get your “nimunization” (nano-immunization). It’s a
set of bots that monitor for what we receive vaccines for now. Polio,
Anthrax, Mumps, whatever. They sit in the infants body and wait for their
enemies to show up. When they do, they attack with impunity.

I envision a doctor having alerts coming to his personal computing device on
his hip — reports on all his patients as updated via the bot controllers. So
when an outbreak of measles happens in his area, and like 400 of his kids
suddenly get faced with the virus, the bots within his patients will attack
the intruder and then report (via their own personal computers that
interface with the bots via short-range wireless) to their doctor the status
of their body.

So the doctor’s sitting there eating lunch and his device alerts him that
this morning 46 of his kids were exposed to measles (which their bots then
killed). So at that point he knows there’s an outbreak. The interesting part
comes when the bots’ analysis engine also reports that the virus was not as
easily killed as before, and that based on current projections the next
variation will be resistant to the bots’ attack.

Misuse, Terrorism, and Warfare

The most frightening implications of this technology are that it would be
utterly trivial, if in control of this technology, to harm and/or kill
people in a very granular fashion. It’s not so much the speed of killing —
many poisons can do that already — it’s the fact that one could decide
who to kill, and could program the killing-bots to make the decision
on very specific attributes.

Someone could, for example, decide to kill everyone with blue eyes, or with
black hair. Or perhaps everyone with a gene that’s linked to a disease or
disability later in life (if the creator was trying to grow a “healthy and
strong” future. Or in the case of war, how about designing bots to kill a
specific race (and then giving the counter/antivenom to those of that race
loyal them). This would probably be very hard to do given the splash damage,
but it’s only psychopaths that’d be considering it in the first place.

Random Ideas

So anyway, here are a few random thoughts along these same lines. I’d love
to hear more if you have them, and/or other tangents in the same vein:

• Heuristic BotsDue to the quickly-mutating nature of the threats
  of the day, bots are then coded with a separate mechanism for
  identifying attackers that they are not specifically coded for and then
  “learning” to defend against them without being specifically programmed
  to do so.

• Realtime UpdatesImagine new organisms being uploaded instantly to
  a massive, centralized computer that determines whether or not it’s
  hostile or benign, and then writes new counter-attack strategies if it
  turns out to be hostile.

• The Class GapWhat if the cost was prohibitive for all but the
  wealthy? What if simple illness became a non-issue for those who had
  money, while it could wipe out huge swaths of the poor?

• Technology Genocide“If you can’t afford bots, you don’t deserve
  to live.” This mentality could lead to a generated pathogen being made
  to attack the poor. Probably not the best idea, though, since the rich
  make money only if the poor exist. Good sci-fi, though.

• Realtime Mass Health MonitoringWhat if we could, over the course
  of 5 years, monitor the national health effects of a new diet fad? So,
  in 2046 bots had to do x amount of heart repair in the United States,
  but after the release of so and so book, it dropped to y amount. As
  such, this diet made the country z more healthy.

Hmm…

Anyway, let me know what you guys think.: