Active Directory domain join accounts are systematically exposing enterprise environments to compromise, even when administrators follow Microsoft’s official guidance.
A comprehensive security analysis reveals that these specialized accounts inherit excessive privileges by default, creating a direct pathway for attackers to escalate access from internal networks to full domain control.
During security assessments, domain join accounts have proven to be one of the most reliable entry points for compromising Active Directory environments.
These accounts function as standard user accounts with elevated permissions necessary for creating computer objects and joining machines to the domain.
However, their design introduces multiple critical vulnerabilities that existing hardening guidance fails to adequately address.
The fundamental problem begins during operating system deployment. When a Help Desk technician opens a new laptop, boots it via PXE, and initiates Windows 11 installation, the system receives the plaintext password of the domain join account embedded in the deployment process.
An attacker positioned anywhere on the internal network needs only to press F12 during boot to gain access to this highly privileged credential.
Configuration files containing these passwords appear in multiple locations including PXE sequences, unattend.xml files, MDT scripts, and configuration management tools.
When a domain join account creates computer objects in Active Directory, it becomes the owner of those objects, enabling attackers to assign themselves full control and perform LAPS password disclosure, Resource-Based Constrained Delegation abuse, and Shadow Credentials exploitation.
Even after administrators remove “Read all properties” permissions at the container level, newly created computer objects automatically grant the Creator Owner read capabilities through default security descriptors, allowing LAPS password extraction through the ms-Mcs-AdmPwd attribute.
Critical Hardening Implementations
Organizations must implement three essential security controls. First, establish machine account quota restrictions to zero:
Set-ADDomain -Identity test.local -Replace @{ 'ms-DS-MachineAccountQuota' = 0 } -VerboseSecond, apply deny ACEs for LAPS password protection:
$entity = "domainjoin"
$guid = "ad27bc2b-cf04-424d-b705-5df50c7d5d37"
$adRights = [System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectoryRights]::ReadProperty
$accessControlType = [System.Security.AccessControl.AccessControlType]::Deny
$identityReference = New-Object System.Security.Principal.NTAccount($entity)
$ace = New-Object System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectoryAccessRule($identityReference, $adRights, $accessControlType, (New-Object Guid $guid))Third, block Resource-Based Constrained Delegation abuse:
$entity = "domainjoin"
$guid = "3f78c3e5-f79a-46bd-a0b8-9d18116ddc79"
$adRights = [System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectoryRights]::WriteProperty
$accessControlType = [System.Security.AccessControl.AccessControlType]::Deny
$ace = New-Object System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectoryAccessRule($identityReference, $adRights, $accessControlType, (New-Object Guid $guid))Microsoft’s delayed response initially declining to issue security updates in October 2021 left administrators relying on unverified sources for years.
However, Microsoft finally published official guidance in August 2025, acknowledging the complexity of managing these permissions.
Effective protection requires layering multiple controls through owner reassignment, deny permission implementation, and quota restrictions.
Security teams must balance functionality against sophisticated attack chains, recognizing that domain join account security requires ongoing commitment rather than checkbox-based compliance approaches.
Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X to Get Instant Updates and Set GBH as a Preferred Source in Google.
