Insyde UEFI Application Vulnerability Enables Digital Certificate Injection Through NVRAM Variable

A critical vulnerability in Insyde H2O UEFI firmware (tracked as CVE-2025-XXXX) allows attackers to bypass Secure Boot protections by injecting malicious digital certificates via an unprotected NVRAM variable.

This flaw exposes millions of devices to pre-boot malware and kernel-level rootkits that evade traditional security monitoring.

How SecureFlashCertData Undermines Secure Boot

The vulnerability centers on improper handling of the SecureFlashCertData NVRAM variable, which stores public keys used to validate firmware updates and UEFI applications. Insyde’s implementation violates two core security principles:

1. Trust Boundary Violation: The variable is stored in writable non-volatile NVRAM without authentication checks.
2. Improper Trust in Volatile Storage: UEFI modules use generic LibGetVariable() calls to retrieve certificates, assuming the variable was set by trusted firmware components.

c// Example of vulnerable variable retrieval in UEFI code  
EFI_STATUS Status = LibGetVariable(  
    L"SecureFlashCertData",  
    &gSomeGuid,  
    &DataSize,  
    (VOID**)&CertData  
);  
// Missing checks for variable attributes (e.g., NV/volatile status)  

Attackers can overwrite this variable from any privileged OS environment using standard UEFI APIs:

Windows (Admin Command Prompt):

powershellSetFirmwareEnvironmentVariable -Name "SecureFlashCertData" -Namespace "{guid}" -Value $(Get-Content attacker_cert.bin -Raw)  

Linux:

bashprintf "x01x02..." > /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/SecureFlashCertData-{guid}  

This grants attackers the ability to execute malicious DXE drivers or UEFI applications signed with their injected certificate during the SEC/PEI phases of boot – before memory protections or OS security tools activate.

Exploitation Impact: Persistent Pre-Boot Compromise

Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities enables three primary attack vectors.

First, attackers can bypass Secure Boot by allowing malicious bootloaders or operating system kernels to appear as legitimate software.

For example, they might stage a GRUB2 payload signed with their own certificate to evade detection.

Second, they can neutralize Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) or antivirus (AV) systems by modifying Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) tables or System Management Mode (SMM) handlers.

This allows them to disable security agents and install persistent bootkits like BlackLotus or CosmicStrand, which can survive OS reinstalls.

Third, exploitation opens the door to supply chain attacks by compromising firmware update mechanisms.

Attackers can deploy malicious capsules, and tools like chipsec demonstrate how unvalidated NVRAM variables can enable unauthorized write access to SPI flash—for instance, using the command python chipsec_main.py -m common.uefi.s3script_modify.

Forensic challenges arise because:

• Attacks leave no disk-based artifacts.
• UEFI event logs (TCG PCRs) may appear unaltered.
• Requires physical hardware inspection or specialized tools like UEFITool.

Mitigation Strategies and Vendor Coordination

1. Firmware Updates

Insyde has released patches (H2O version XX.XX.XX) that:

• Replace LibGetVariable() with authenticated variable APIs
• Implement VariableLockProtocol to restrict writes
• Set EFI_VARIABLE_READ_ONLY attribute for SecureFlashCertData

2. Runtime Protections

Enable these features if available in device firmware settings:

• DisableVariableWrite (Intel VT-d)
• UEFI Variable Guard (Windows 11)

3. Detection Methods

Check NVRAM state using UEFI shell:

shelldmpstore -all -guid {INSYDE_SECUREFLASH_GUID}  

Look for unexpected certificates or non-volatile attributes.

Major OEMs including Lenovo, Dell, and HP have begun rolling out firmware updates. System administrators should:

• Monitor vendor advisories (see table below)
• Prioritize updates for devices with Secure Boot Custom Mode enabled

The Insyde UEFI flaw underscores critical risks in firmware supply chains, where a single vulnerable component propagates across multiple vendors.

While patches are emerging, organizations should pair firmware updates with runtime integrity monitoring and UEFI-aware EDR solutions.

This incident serves as a clarion call for improved NVRAM security standards and mandatory variable lockdowns in UEFI implementations.

Find this News Interesting! Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, & X to Get Instant Updates