CISOOnline

Aviation solved the vigilance problem. AI just gave security a worse one

This is where aviation’s rule actually lands, and it lands on the dumb machine. Guard those actions with something that fires on the event itself, not on a human’s read of it: a mandatory callback to a known number for any change of bank details, dual control on a wire, a hard threshold above which a payment stops on its own.

None of this is new. These controls used to serve as belt and suspenders behind an email filter that caught the obvious lure. The tell is disappearing, so these controls have to carry more of the load. Like the collision system, they read no one’s intent. They fire on the act, every time, and ask no one to be clever.

What they miss is the wire that is already coherent: a request from a genuinely compromised vendor thread, correct in every detail, that a callback confirms because the fraudster holds the other end too. Catching that means judging whether an action makes sense in context, the adversarial problem a collision system never had to solve.



Source link