VendorResearch

October 2026 CVE Landscape


In October 2026, Insikt Group® identified 82 high-impact vulnerabilities to prioritize for remediation, 52 of which had a Very Critical Recorded Future Risk Score. This represents a 13% decrease from the 94 vulnerabilities reported in September.

36 of October’s high-impact CVEs were surfaced through the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, 33 were reported in open sources and validated by Insikt Group, and 13 were exclusively surfaced through honeypot data.

The 82 vulnerabilities in this report affected products from 51 vendors, with Citrix and Microsoft together accounting for approximately 15% of the vulnerabilities. The remaining exposure spanned network edge and security management appliances; operating systems and endpoint software; collaboration, content management, and enterprise platforms; and artificial intelligence (AI), developer, and automation tools.

Insikt Group created a Nuclei template to detect the two PHP2Shell vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619). Insikt Group also published templates for CVE-2026-87902 (WordPress) and CVE-2026-86124 (AutoAgent). These are available to customers in the Recorded Future Intelligence Operations Platform.

Quick reference: October 2026 vulnerability table

All 69 vulnerabilities below were actively exploited or operationally weaponized in October 2026. This table does not include the 13 CVEs that were exclusively surfaced through honeypot data, which are available to Recorded Future Intelligence Platform customers via the CVE Monthly report. The table below also provides examples of public PoCs identified by Insikt Group. These PoCs were not tested for accuracy or efficacy. Vulnerability management teams should exercise caution and verify the validity of PoCs before testing.

#

Vulnerability

Risk
Score

Vendor/Product

KEV

RCE

PoC

1

CVE-2015-3306

99

ProFTPD

✓

2

CVE-2015-5477

99

ISC BIND

✓

3

CVE-2016-3081

99

Apache Struts

✓

✓

4

CVE-2021-22205

99

GitLab

✓

5

CVE-2021-3199

99

ONLYOFFICE Docs

✓

✓

6

CVE-2021-4034

99

Red Hat Polkit

✓

7

CVE-2023-22894

99

Strapi

✓

8

CVE-2023-4863

99

Google Chrome (libwebp)

9

CVE-2025-61624

99

Fortinet FortiOS

✓

10

CVE-2025-8088

99

WinRAR

✓

11

CVE-2026-0322

99

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS

✓

✓

12

CVE-2026-102490

99

Zammad

✓

13

CVE-2026-102764

99

BeyondTrust Remote Support

✓

14

CVE-2026-104286

99

Fortinet FortiMail

✓

15

CVE-2026-104935

99

Ivanti Connect Secure

✓

✓

16

CVE-2026-105133

99

AhsayCBS

✓

17

CVE-2026-105134

99

AhsayCBS

✓

✓

18

CVE-2026-106931

99

EG Secure Solutions SiteGuard Server Edition

✓

✓

19

CVE-2026-109618

99

PHP

✓

✓

20

CVE-2026-109619

99

PHP

✓

✓

21

CVE-2026-110447

99

Collabora Online (CODE Server)

✓

✓

22

CVE-2026-110936

99

Siemens Software Center

✓

✓

23

CVE-2026-111357

99

Ivanti Connect Secure

✓

24

CVE-2026-111497

99

Google Brotli

✓

✓

25

CVE-2026-114625

99

Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator

✓

26

CVE-2026-118527

99

Ivanti Connect Secure

✓

27

CVE-2026-21589

99

Atlassian Data Center and server products

✓

28

CVE-2026-41709

99

VMware ESX

✓

29

CVE-2026-46300

99

Linux kernel

✓

30

CVE-2026-48356

99

Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source

✓

✓

31

CVE-2026-60137

99

WordPress

32

CVE-2026-63030

99

WordPress

✓

33

CVE-2026-72898

99

Metabase

34

CVE-2026-76418

99

Cisco Secure Firewall ASA and FTD Software

✓

35

CVE-2026-76519

99

Cisco Secure Email Gateway

✓

✓

36

CVE-2026-88779

99

Citrix NetScaler ADC and Gateway

✓

37

CVE-2026-90817

99

Vanderbilt University REDCap

✓

38

CVE-2026-96951

99

Microsoft Windows Shell

✓

✓

39

CVE-2026-97229

99

GitLab CE/EE

✓

✓

40

CVE-2014-6271

89

GNU Bash

✓

41

CVE-2019-11510

89

Ivanti Pulse Connect Secure

42

CVE-2025-53770

89

Microsoft SharePoint Server

✓

43

CVE-2026-0257

89

Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS

44

CVE-2026-102489

89

Zammad

✓

✓

45

CVE-2026-114509

89

Laravel

46

CVE-2026-20127

89

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN

47

CVE-2026-61500

89

Rejetto HFS

✓

48

CVE-2010-1871

79

Red Hat JBoss Seam 2

✓

49

CVE-2014-6278

79

GNU Bash

✓

50

CVE-2022-36553

79

Hytec Inter HWL-2511-SS

✓

51

CVE-2024-23625

79

D-Link DAP-1650

✓

52

CVE-2024-47575

79

Fortinet FortiManager

✓

53

CVE-2025-1055

79

K7 Security Anti-Malware

54

CVE-2025-34035

79

EnGenius EnShare

✓

55

CVE-2025-49704

79

Microsoft SharePoint Server

✓

56

CVE-2025-49706

79

Microsoft SharePoint Server

57

CVE-2025-53771

79

Microsoft SharePoint Server

58

CVE-2026-101767

79

Oracle E-Business Suite

59

CVE-2026-105740

79

Langflow

✓

60

CVE-2026-106173

79

Fortinet FortiSIEM

✓

61

CVE-2026-118539

79

Drupal Commerce Core

62

CVE-2026-4815

79

Schiocco Support Board

63

CVE-2026-85097

79

Bricksforge

64

CVE-2026-96652

79

Plex Media Server

✓

65

CVE-2026-96654

79

Plex Media Server

✓

66

CVE-2026-96655

79

Plex Media Server

✓

67

CVE-2026-96656

79

Plex Media Server

✓

68

CVE-2015-1397

70

Magento

69

CVE-2026-116690

70

MLflow

Table 1: List of vulnerabilities that were actively exploited in October 2026 based on Recorded Future data (excluding honeypot-sourced CVEs).

  • PHP2Shell reporting covered confirmed honeypot shell execution, a Fragnesia chain yielding root access on 25 servers, and Potassium-associated payload attempts. Other PHP2Shell activity involved suspected preparations for a North Korean attack, which was assessed with moderate confidence as linked to the Lazarus Group. Other exploitation activity this month included Longlegs deploying Warlock ransomware; ransomware groups exploiting PAN-OS; CL-STA-0954 targeting Fortinet products for data theft; PEERSTITCH deployment; Integrity Technology Group-enabled espionage; CyberXero’s AI-assisted exploitation; and ClingSTUN deployment.
  • 37 of the 82 vulnerabilities enabled remote code execution (RCE). Collaboration, content-management, and enterprise platforms were the most affected product type, with 12 vulnerabilities. Microsoft had the largest vendor share, with three vulnerabilities.
  • Insikt Group identified public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits or scanners for 37 of the 82 vulnerabilities in this report.
  • The most common weakness class was CWE-78 (OS Command Injection), with eight vulnerabilities, followed by CWE-287 (Improper Authentication), with seven. CWE-22 (Path Traversal) and CWE-77 (Command Injection) each affected six vulnerabilities.
  • 10 of the 82 vulnerabilities were at least five years old, and the oldest was approximately 16 years old.

Trend analysis

PHP2Shell exploitation enables root access and internal pivoting

In October, two vulnerabilities in PHP, CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619 (collectively referred to as “PHP2Shell”), drew attention from threat actors, who also chained them with CVE-2026-46300, a Linux kernel vulnerability known as Fragnesia. Following their disclosure, Insikt Group published multiple notes and detection rules involving PHP2Shell in October. Highlights from our coverage include:

  • Root access and internal pivoting: A TTP Instance detailed a campaign chaining CVE-2026-109618 (PHP) and CVE-2026-109619 (PHP) with CVE-2026-46300 (Linux kernel), also known as Fragnesia. Dream Research reported root access on 25 servers, including systems in a US government-affiliated environment. PHP2Shell provided initial access, and Fragnesia enabled privilege escalation. The actor deployed web shells, stole configurations, credentials, and private keys, and maintained reverse Secure Shell (SSH) tunnels to internal systems, enabling service-account password decryption and Active Directory enumeration. Domain-account creation was attempted but not confirmed.
  • Technical analysis and exploit development: A separate TTP Instance explained PHP2Shell’s memory-lifecycle failures enabling unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE), highlighting Apache mod_php exposure and unvalidated early PoCs. Separate TTP Instances covering reports from SOCRadar and AkatsukiLegion described actor-staged exploits, prerequisite checks, and a memory-leak-to-command-execution chain.
  • Threat actor pre-positioning: Two other TTP Instances covered PHP2Shell tooling on an extortion actor’s staging server and CYFIRMA’s assessment of suspected North Korean preparations using 21 compromised nodes to check 216 hosts. CYFIRMA assessed a Lazarus Group connection with moderate confidence. Neither earlier shared-hosting intrusions nor attack preparations established a successful PHP2Shell compromise.
  • Botnet activity: A TTP Instance covering Arctic Wolf and Cisco Talos described probes and payload-download attempts associated with Potassium, a Mirai-derived botnet. In separate TTP Instances covering Linux bots reported by Joe Security and Nextron Research, Insikt Group corroborated remote-shell, evasion, and denial-of-service capabilities in the former, and PHP2Shell testing, scanning, downloads, and persistence in the latter. These findings did not confirm successful malware delivery through PHP2Shell.
  • Detection rule coverage: Insikt Group created Sigma rules for Linux and Windows to detect web or PHP workers spawning shells, including PowerShell, and Suricata and Snort rules for multipart session-ID and upload-progress requests. Network detection requires visible HTTP bodies. Correlate these alerts with process creation, worker errors, and outbound activity because individual matches can be benign.
  • Separate PHP vulnerability: A TTP Instance reported on CVE-2026-115560 (PHP), a vulnerability distinct from PHP2Shell that could enable unauthenticated RCE in applications switching session serializers while upload progress is enabled. No in-the-wild exploitation was established at the time of publication. PHP recommended disabling session upload progress pending a separate fix; the initial PHP2Shell patches did not address this vulnerability.

Ransomware and data theft follow exploitation of collaboration and security platforms

A Validated Intelligence Event detailed Longlegs, also known as Storm-2603, exploiting CVE-2025-49704, CVE-2025-49706, CVE-2025-53770, and CVE-2025-53771 (all related to SharePoint Server). Symantec reported that the actor used the ToolShell chain to access critical infrastructure organizations, move laterally, and deploy Warlock ransomware. The intrusion included domain-account privilege changes, credential spraying, and remote-access tunnels. The actor disabled endpoint protections and staged ransomware in a domain replication path, allowing normal replication to propagate the binaries between domain controllers.

A Vulnerability Intelligence note linked exploitation of CVE-2026-0257 (PAN-OS) to Qilin, Settra, and Tarnished Scorpius, which overlaps with activity Recorded Future tracks as INC Ransom. The reporting described the use of BloodHound and SharpHound to examine Active Directory relationships.

A separate Vulnerability Intelligence note described Longlegs exploiting CVE-2025-1055 (K7 Anti-Malware) through the signed K7RKScan driver to terminate protected security processes. Although this activity is also linked to Longlegs, it is separate from the SharePoint exploitation activity described above.

A Validated Intelligence Event linked CL-STA-0954 to exploitation of CVE-2024-47575 (FortiManager) and CVE-2025-61624 (FortiOS). Unit 42 reported command execution, theft of sensitive data associated with more than 500 managed FortiGate firewalls, traffic interception, and deployment of PEERSTITCH.


Additional trends and analyses from October are available to Recorded Future customers.

Take action

Timely and relevant information on vulnerabilities in your environment and that of your vendors and suppliers is critical for reducing risk. Find out how Recorded Future can support your team by increasing visibility, improving efficiency, and enabling confident decisions.

Vulnerability Prioritization – Prioritize vulnerabilities based on the likelihood of exploitation – not just the severity. Easily understand the risk of exploitation alongside severity, and real-time contextualized intelligence to help you quickly make confident decisions, patch what matters, and prevent attacks.

Attack Surface Intelligence – Identify internet-facing assets vulnerable to a specific CVE. Attack Surface Intelligence provides an outside-in view of your organization to help you actively discover, prioritize, and respond to unknown, vulnerable, or misconfigured assets.

Third-Party Risk – Gain an external view of the security posture of your vendors and partners. Eliminate time-consuming research and vendor communication cycles with the ability to promptly assess vulnerabilities in their internet-facing systems.

Insikt Group® – Receive access to exclusive reports on new vulnerabilities and trends from Recorded Future’s team of experts, the Insikt Group®. Download Nuclei templates created by Insikt Group® for select CVEs to detect actively exploited vulnerabilities.

Recorded Future Professional Services – Work with our Professional Services team on a Vulnerability Analysis Engagement. Designed to equip your team with advanced strategies for identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating threats effectively, this program delves into technologies and operations essential for a successful vulnerability management program. (Learn more about how our Professional Services team can help elevate your team by watching our recent Vulnerability Prioritization Workshop.)

About Insikt Group®

Recorded Future’s Insikt Group, the company’s threat research division, comprises analysts and security researchers with deep government, law enforcement, military, and intelligence agency experience. Their mission is to produce intelligence that reduces risk for customers, enables tangible outcomes, and prevents business disruption.



Source link